If you often wonder how new laws being debated in the Legislature might affect Tennessee business and industry operating costs, you might have a designated place to look in the future.
Senate Bill 116 and House Bill 220 would both require a statement of “impact on commerce” for proposed new legislation heard in certain committees. The full Senate has already passed its version of the idea this year, while HB220 is still slogging through lower-chamber committees.
“From a fiscal standpoint, when we pass a bill down here, our communities back home really need to know what is going to be that impact,” Sen. Bill Ketron, R-Murfreesboro, told the Senate State & Local Government Committee last month during a hearing on the cost-to-business bill he’s sponsoring.
Ketron, who also chairs the Joint Fiscal Review Committee, said states like Florida, Maryland, Delaware and New Jersey already require such analysis on legislative proposals. He said the bill was suggested to him by chambers of commerce around Tennessee.
Rep. Mark White, the House sponsor, said the bill will help legislators know how their proposals are “affecting the business person in the state as we try to make Tennessee a more business-friendly state.” The Republican from Germantown is vice chairman of the Fiscal Review Committee.
Ketron said initially there were concerns about the additional work becoming a burden on the staff who prepare cost-to-taxpayers and government revenue estimates for proposed laws, otherwise know as “fiscal notes.” However, after many conversations with Fiscal Review Director Bill Geise, Ketron said it’s been determined staff can take on the extra work within the existing budget.
The process would, if approved, be phased in over a two-year period, with three standing committees – House Business & Utilities, House Insurance & Banking and Senate Commerce & Labor – receiving the impact statements beginning Jan. 1, 2014. Then in January 2015, six additional standing committees will begin receiving the statements: Senate and House Finance, Ways & Means; House State Government; House Local Government; House Consumer & Human Resources; and Senate State and Local Government.
While the bill cruised through the Senate in March 32-0, HB220 was postponed Wednesday to the last meeting of the House Finance, Ways & Means Subcommittee after Rep. Charles Sargent raised a question about the phase-in implementation.
Sargent, the House Finance, Ways & Means Committee chairman, wanted to add a verbal amendment to the bill that would exclude the six other standing committees from receiving the business impact statements in 2015. However, Rep. Michael Harrison, chair of the subcommittee, would not allow it, saying that the committee had “turned down the gentleman from Knoxville on a verbal amendment…to be fair to everyone.”
House Bill 220 is on the House Finance, Ways & Means Subcommittee’s April 10 calendar.