Education Featured NewsTracker

Current Pre-K Funding Staying Where it Is, Haslam Says

Governor not ready to draw conclusions from initial results of ongoing Vandy study

Gov. Bill Haslam, Tuesday, reiterated his determination to keep funding pre-kindergarten programs in Tennessee at current levels but remained mum about any future plans for expansion.

Speaking to reporters in Jackson, Haslam commented on recent preliminary results from a study by Vanderbilt University comparing the performance of students exposed to pre-k programs and those who are not. The study is ongoing, but the report released last week shows mixed results, especially relating to how long benefits of pre-k education last.

“The results they just reported were a little discouraging in terms of the amount of gain that those pre-k students held on to,” Haslam said Tuesday. “But,” he continued, “we think there are other things to measure and our commitment is to keep funding at its current level until we see another year of two of the study and then we’ll decide from there.”

As The Tennessean reports, the state currently spends about $86 million on pre-k programs, mostly for low income children, and it is eligible to add another $64 million in federal money if Haslam and the legislature agree to put up another $6.4 million in state funds, something that could be less politically viable given the recent Vanderbilt results.

Some critics of pre-k spending including Knoxville Republican state Rep. Bill Dunn have already jumped on the report in recent days. In a statement earlier this week, Dunn dismissed pre-k programs as “very expensive hype.”

For his part, Haslam brushed past any mention of possible political snags, saying Tuesday that his administration would wait at least another year for final results of the study before making any decisions about pursuing the federal expansion dollars.

One reply on “Current Pre-K Funding Staying Where it Is, Haslam Says”

I’ve read a lot on this matter. It comes to my attention, that they are comparing children who have the qualificatons to be apart of the pre-school program to children who DO NOT meet the qualifications. For exsample if a child has already been identified in haveing a delay then pre-k is there to give them that boost. Would it also be fair to say or question that if pre-k hadn’t been apart of their foundation of education, how much worse would it had been for that child. I have two adopted children that have benefited from the pre-k program. I can say, in all honesty that without pre-k, my girls would definitely struggle in school. As it is right now both children are doing exceptionally well in reading and math. just a thought.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *