Categories
Featured Liberty and Justice News Transparency and Elections

Courting Conflicts

Most defendants would love to have the power to handpick judges assigned to decide a lawsuit against them. Gov. Bill Haslam, it seems, finds himself in just that enviable position.

Late last Friday afternoon, Haslam announced he had chosen the members of a special ad hoc panel. The panel will serve as a temporary state Supreme Court to rule on a lawsuit that names the governor as a defendant.

The move became necessary after all the the sitting members of the Tennessee Supreme Court recused themselves from hearing the case of John Jay Hooker, on behalf of himself and others, v. Governor Bill Haslam, et al. The lawsuit on appeal is a challenge to the constitutionality of Tennessee’s “merit selection” appointment and “retention election” system of picking appellate and Supreme Court judges.

Asked at a press conference this week if he’d struggled with the potential appearance of a conflict of interest, Haslam indicated his administration had indeed discussed the matter and had decided that he was required by law to appoint the panel.

“We talked with our legal counsel about that,” the governor said after a higher education discussion at Scripps Network in Knoxville Tuesday.

“If the existing Supreme Court recuses themselves, somebody has to appoint them and that’s the governor’s role under the Constitution in the state of Tennessee,” he said.

The matter has been simmering in the background for years, with Hooker, an outlying but ever-enduring fixture on Tennessee’s political scene, tending the flame. The subject of judicial elections has taken on renewed prominence in the past couple years, as many majority-party Republican lawmakers have said they are committed to reconciling the practice of selecting judges with the state Constitution, which they see as at odds with one another.

Hooker told TNReport this week he knew from the get-go Haslam would have to choose members for the special court. But he says he has the right to question and challenge those appointments, for example that of William Barker, a retired Supreme Court justice.

“How can he possibly be impartial in the matter?” Hooker said. “He’s got a vested interest. What is the difference in his interest as a former member of the Supreme Court or the sitting member on the Supreme Court?”

The court system so far has no timeline for when the case would be heard, according to Casey Mahoney, the court system spokeswoman.

House Speaker Beth Harwell is also named in the lawsuit. Her office says there’s nothing worrisome about the governor appointing judges on the court to hear the case.

“It is a statutory duty of the governor to appoint a special state Supreme Court in instances such as this, and literally no one else in the state is given such authority,” said spokeswoman Kara Owen. “There is no reason to expect that this panel would be anything but fair and impartial in the proceedings.”

The outcome of the legal decision could be paramount in the ongoing fight over whether the state is truly “electing” judges.

High-ranking members of the judiciary are selected by the governor who then face “yes-no” retention elections to renew their eight-year terms. Critics of the current system known as the “Tennessee Plan” say the Tennessee Constitution calls for judges to be “elected,” much like lawmakers and lower-level judges are.

The state Constitution says, “The judges of the Supreme Court shall be elected by the qualified voters of the State.” It also states, “The judges of the Circuit and Chancery Courts, and of other inferior Courts, shall be elected by the qualified voters of the district or circuit to which they are to be assigned.”

Haslam and the top two Republican legislative leaders are resolute opponents to high-ranking judges facing popular elections. The trio rallied around the idea of rewriting the constitution to reflect how judges are currently selected, but the Republican-led legislature was split on the idea and ultimately dumped that proposal, SJR184, late in the legislative session.

Instead, they agreed on SJR710, which stipulates that the General Assembly should first have to approve the governor’s judicial appointees, then send the judges on their way to retention elections.

House Republican Caucus Leader Debra Maggart voted in favor of legislative confirmation, although attempts to reach her for comment on the lawsuit were unsuccessful Wednesday.

Courtney Rogers, a Republican running against Maggart in Sumner County, maintains that the state ought to bring itself in line with a literal reading of the constitution and require judges to face popular elections, said her spokesman Jeff Heartline. Although he said she had no preference yet on how the constitution should assign judges to the bench.

“If we were following the Constitution, these questions wouldn’t come up,” said Rogers’ spokesman Jeff Hartline, when asked what Rogers thought about the lawsuit. “Let’s follow the constitution and let the people decide.”

The issue has divided Republicans in the Legislature and on the primary campaign trail. Sen. Doug Overby, R-Maryville, has stressed that people shouldn’t employ their own literal reading of the state’s guiding document to justify judicial election. They should instead look to the Supreme Court’s guidance on matters of interpretation.

Andrea Zelinski and Itzel Gonzalez contributed to this report.

Categories
News NewsTracker Transparency and Elections

Maggart ‘Maligned Unfairly’: Ramsey

The House GOP Caucus chairwoman insists she’s in little trouble of being voted out of office, but she now has both the governor and the Senate speaker running to her defense.

Lt. Gov. Ron Ramsey said he is joining the crowd of high-ranking Republicans to back the embattled Rep. Debra Maggart, who has become a political target among some Tea Party groups and the Tennessee Firearms Association.

“I do think she’s been maligned unfairly,” Ramsey told reporters on Capitol Hill Thursday, adding he plans to attend her campaign events.

Maggart is facing off against Courtney Rogers, a former Air Force lieutenant colonel. Rogers is backed by conservatives who blame Maggart for the failure of several key pieces of legislation, including a measure that would have allowed gun owners to stow their firearms in their car parked on employers property.

Gov. Bill Haslam is supporting Maggart, saying she’s taking “a lot of unmerited heat” for the so-called “guns in parking lots” issue which has set staunch gun-rights supporters against businesses owners and corporate executives who argue that their property rights trump the Second Amendment.

“It may have made me an easier target,” said Maggart, “but I can tell you that people appreciate it when you stand up and do the right thing. I’ve had just a great response from the people in my district. They’re proud of me and they’re proud of the things I have done.”

Ramsey said he also plans to support Sen. Doug Overbey, R-Maryville, in the primary election race against fellow Republican Scott Hughes of Seymour who is CEO of Fuse Church in Knoxville.

The lieutenant governor said he expects Tennessee voters to shrink the the 33-member Senate’s Democrat representation from 13 seats to eight.

Categories
Press Releases

Lawmakers Seek Increased Penalties for Child Prostitution, Human Trafficking

Press Release from State Sen. Doug Overbey (R-Maryville) and Rep. Debra Maggart (R-Hendersonville), Jan. 26, 2011:

(NASHVILLE, TN), January 26, 2011 — State Senator Doug Overbey (R-Maryville) and Representative Debra Maggart (R-Hendersonville) have introduced legislation designed to attack the growing problem of child prostitution and human trafficking in Tennessee.  The legislation would enhance penalties against those who patronize or promote the illegal act, as well gives law enforcement powers to impound a vehicle used in the commission of the offense.

“Trafficking children for sex is intolerable,” said Maggart.  “This legislation would strengthen penalties against those promoting and patronizing these young victims.”

Currently, patronizing prostitution is a Class B misdemeanor in Tennessee, unless the crimes are committed within 100 feet of a church or 1.5 miles of a school, which is punishable as a Class A misdemeanor.  The legislation would make patronizing prostitution from a person who is younger than 18 years of age or is mentally defective a Class E felony.  Penalties for promoting prostitution would be increased from a Class E to a Class D felony when a minor is involved, under the bill. Additionally, the proposal specifies that if it is determined that a person charged with prostitution is under age 18, they would be immune from prosecution for prostitution and be subject to the protective custody of the Department of Children’s Services.

“These predators and criminal gangs target children because of their vulnerability, as well as the market demand for these young victims,” added Overbey.  “That is why it is so important to strengthen penalties against those who exploit them.  It is intolerable that in 2011, this crime is growing rather than decreasing.  We must begin to take the steps needed to address it.”

The Legislature’s Joint Committee on Children and Youth heard testimony last fall from Tennessee Bureau of Investigation Assistant Special Agent in Charge Margie Quinn who said law enforcement agencies have seen a “dramatic increase” in the crime recently.  Quinn testified that Tennessee’s proximity to Atlanta, which is the worst city in the nation, puts the state in harm’s way.

In November, federal authorities broke up a human trafficking ring that provided underage prostitutes involving 29 Somali men and women with ties to outlaw gangs.  According to the indictment, one of the intentions of those involved was to identify, recruit and obtain girls under age 14 for prostitution.  The ring operated in Nashville, Minneapolis and Columbus, Ohio.  The National Center for Missing and Exploited Children reports that one in four children who run away are approached for commercial sexual exploitation within 48 hours of leaving home.

January has been declared National Slavery and Human Trafficking Prevention Month to spotlight the problem.  The legislation, Senate Bill 64 / House Bill 35, will be scheduled for a hearing upon the legislature’s return to Capitol Hill on February 7.